The same controls, reassessed three times — once for the regulator, once for SOC 2, once for the board — is three chances to contradict yourself. CyberSentien flips it: one assessment run is the single source of truth, and every deliverable renders from it.
See it run on sample docs →The deepest output we build: per-control evidence chains, assessor-style rationale, SAR structure, hash-chained sign-off ledger. Where we go deepest — Australia's ISM and Essential Eight.
Switch the output, not the assessment: the identical verdicts render each framework's report. You re-rendered — you didn't re-assess.
The executive view drawn from the very same numbers, so the board sees exactly what the auditor sees. No drift.
Verdicts are measured against the FULL catalogue. Controls without evidence read “manual assessment required” — an honest gap, never a fabricated pass.
Same evidence, same result — no model roulette deciding your posture. The AI assists with matching; it never decides a verdict.
Every report traces each section to the controls and evidence it rests on, sealed with a SHA-256 anchor in a tamper-evident ledger.
Evidence uploads work everywhere regardless: policies, registers, exports and reports feed the same assessment spine as connector signals.
Run the engine on synthetic sample docs and open the ISM report, the framework report and the board pack from the same run id.