A compliance verdict you can defend.

CyberSentien assesses your real evidence against 58 frameworks and shows a credit only when it can prove one. Everything unproven is marked for assessor review, never badged green. Built and hosted in Australia.

58frameworks live on the engine
1924sealed test pairs ruled (1312 owner-ruled, 612 AI-assessed and owner-adopted)
1frameworks with AI credits switched on after a zero-error sealed run
0credits shown from documents that prove nothing (calibration run 38300764212)
🏦 Banks & APRA-regulated🏥 Insurers & APRA-regulated💰 Superannuation & RSE licensees🏢 Small & medium business🏛 Government & Defence💼 GRC consultants & practices🧠 AI vendors & providers — GAiaaS🏥 Healthcare⚡ Critical infrastructure — SOCI🔗 Third-party & supplier risk🎓 Schools & education Early childhood education & care⚖ APRA CPS 230 & CPS 234All solutions →

Two lanes

For GRC practices

Run Essential Eight, ISM/IRAP, CPS 230/234 and ISO 27001 engagements on one engine. A consultant-grade report, an executive brief and a board pack from one run, each with a run id and a SHA-256 integrity anchor. A multi-client book. Founder pilot: locked pricing for the first five Australian practices.

Start a free demo week → GRC practice console

For rail and OT operators

Import your OT monitoring exports and get IEC 62443-3-3 evidence per zone, a CLC/TS 50701 traceability matrix and decks for the safety board. Each check says met, not met or not measured, and why. CSV import today; no API connector yet.

See the Rail & OT page → Rail & OT →

How we prove correctness

Four steps, and the measured results are public.

1. The authority's words, or ours, labelled

Controls use the authority's published text where its licence allows, attributed. Elsewhere they are CyberSentien's own plain-language wording, aligned to the standard and labelled as ours.

2. Records, not promises

A policy that says a control exists is not evidence it operates. Logs, exports, registers and reviews are.

3. Tested on sealed sets

Each framework is tested against evidence-and-control pairs ruled by the owner, or by an AI assessor whose rulings the owner adopted, and held out of all training. The engine's verdicts on them are measured, never tuned.

4. A credit only after zero errors

AI-assisted credits switch on for a framework only after a sealed run with zero wrong credits. Until then that framework shows assessor review. The results are on the Correctness Board, dated, with the run that produced them.

What you get

One run produces the assessment report, an executive brief and a board pack. Every report carries a run id and a SHA-256 integrity anchor a third party can verify without an account. 62 evidence connectors read live settings at the authority's own thresholds. Data at rest is encrypted, the audit log is hash-chained, and the platform is hosted on Australian infrastructure.

What we don't claim

We are not a certification body or an IRAP assessor; the output is evidence and readiness. Frameworks not yet proven on a sealed run show assessor review rather than AI credits. We run on one Australian host today, and an independent penetration test is unbooked. The trust centre lists everything else.

Three steps to buy

1. Demo week

Free. Synthetic documents now, or your own evidence in a gated workspace. Rail: one real export.

2. Pilot

One full assessment on your evidence, credited in full against a subscription taken within 90 days.

3. Subscribe

Published annual tiers; Rail & OT is scoped.

See pricing

Frameworks on the engine today

Every entry below is a live catalogue on the assessment spine, generated from the engine's own data at build time. Other audiences, from schools to AI governance, are under Solutions.

Security & assurance — global

ISO/IEC 27001:2022SOC 2 (Trust Services Criteria)SOC 1 (ISAE 3402)SOC 3 (Trust Services Criteria — general-use report)CIS Controls v8CyberSentien CISSP-aligned Security Practice AssessmentPCI DSS v4.0.1NIST CSF 2.0Fraud & AML (AUSTRAC AML/CTF)Environmental & Sustainability (AASB S2 / NGER / ISSB)CyberSentien HITRUST CSF Readiness AssessmentCyberSentien Secure SDLC AssuranceCyberSentien ISO/IEC 27017-aligned Cloud Services Security AssessmentCyberSentien ISO/IEC 27018-aligned Cloud Privacy AssessmentCyberSentien ISO/IEC 27034-aligned Application Security AssessmentCyberSentien ISO/IEC 27036-aligned Supplier and Supply Chain AssessmentProtective Security Policy Framework (Release 2026)Australian Privacy Principles (Privacy Act 1988, Sch 1)Consumer Data Right (CDR Rules, Schedule 2)SOCI Critical Infrastructure Risk Management ProgramRight Fit For Risk (DEWR)CyberSentien IEC 62443-3-2-aligned OT Risk AssessmentCyberSentien IEC 62443-3-3-aligned OT System Security AssessmentCyberSentien IEC 62443-4-2-aligned OT Component Security AssessmentCyberSentien CLC/TS 50701-aligned Railway Cybersecurity AssessmentCredit Licensee Obligations (NCCP Act 2009)Mortgage Broker Best Interests Duty (NCCP Act 2009, Part 3-5A)SMB1001:2026 (SMB certification readiness)Australian Schools — cyber, privacy & child safetyFedRAMP Moderate — NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 baselineAustralian Early Childhood (ECEC — National Law, privacy & child safety)NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 (full catalogue)

Frequently asked questions

Straight answers about what CyberSentien is, what it assesses, where your data lives, and what it costs.

What is CyberSentien?

CyberSentien is an Australian-owned compliance assurance platform that assesses an organisation once against its real evidence and reports across many frameworks — Essential Eight, ISM (IRAP-aligned depth), APRA CPS 230 and CPS 234, and AI governance — and maps that same evidence to ISO 27001, SOC 2 and ISO 42001 readiness. It produces deterministic verdicts with per-control evidence chains and tamper-evident report lineage.

Is CyberSentien the same as CyberSentience or CyberSentriq?

No. CyberSentien (CyberSentien Pty Ltd, ACN 688 655 334, New South Wales) is a separate Australian compliance-assurance software company. It is not affiliated with CyberSentience, a New Zealand threat-intelligence firm, or with CyberSentriq. The correct spelling is “CyberSentien” and the website is cybersentien.com.

What compliance frameworks does CyberSentien assess?

Essential Eight (with ML1–ML3 maturity), the ISM at IRAP-aligned depth, and APRA CPS 230 and CPS 234, plus AI-governance frameworks including the NSW AI Assessment Framework, QLD FAIRA, NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act. For ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 and ISO 42001 it maps your evidence to a readiness/crosswalk view — not an independent certification: CyberSentien gets you audit-ready, and an accredited certifier issues the certificate.

Where is CyberSentien data hosted?

For licensed engagements: on Australian-sovereign infrastructure, with no third-party AI API. A licensed deployment generates its answers on its own box — Australian-hosted, inside the deployment boundary, with no third-party AI API in the loop. The engine states its own processing location on request, and you can check it: /api/ai-statement reports the lane that actually served your answer (rather than the one we would like to claim). Licensed engagements run exclusively on Australian-sovereign compute. Evidence stays inside the boundary. Retention follows the engagement policy; tenant owners can obtain an integrity-manifested export before deletion, and legal holds fail closed — the reason sovereignty is the platform's first design principle.

How much does CyberSentien cost?

Three platform tiers, plus per-school and per-service sector lanes. Billed annually or monthly in AUD (annual is the cheaper way to buy): Core from $11,343, Professional from $23,872 and Enterprise from $64,467. All subscriptions are prepaid — cancel any time and you keep access to the end of the period you have paid for. Pricing scales with framework breadth and deployment model; the gated demo is free and requires no documents of your own.

How correct is it?

Each framework is tested on a sealed set of evidence-and-control pairs held out of all training, and AI credits switch on for a framework only after a sealed run with zero wrong credits. Until then the framework shows candidate evidence for assessor review. The measured results, with the run behind each one, are on the Correctness Board.

How is CyberSentien different from other GRC tools?

It never shows a false green. Controls without evidence read “manual assessment required” rather than a fabricated pass, coverage is measured against full catalogues, and every report carries a validation run id and a SHA-256 integrity anchor an auditor or regulator can verify independently.

See it on the real engine

A working demo on live machinery, not slides. Read the methodology, browse the resources, or meet the founder.

Run the free demo →