ISM / IRAP assessment on CyberSentien

This is where CyberSentien goes deepest. The full Information Security Manual catalogue on the engine's OSCAL spine, assessed the way an IRAP assessor documents it: requirement, evidence, written rationale — control by control, with SAR-structured reporting and Essential Eight maturity across ML1–ML3.

Book an ISM demo → Run it on sample docs

Used by: Government & Defence · GRC consultants & practices · Critical infrastructure — SOCI

Consultant-grade depth

Assessor-grade rationale

Every control is reasoned from evidence, not a template — the same chain a human assessor documents, ready for an IRAP engagement.

Consultant-grade depth

SAR-structured output

Scoped, structured, traceable reporting with per-control evidence chains and a hash-chained sign-off ledger — the deliverable a practice stakes its name on.

Consultant-grade depth

Honest at depth

No evidence still means “manual assessment required” — never a pass you can't defend to the ASD.

Sovereign where it matters most

Protected evidence never leaves the boundary: the AI runs locally on Australian-sovereign infrastructure, with no third-party AI API in the loop. The sovereignty commitments →

IRAP depth, built for Australia

Consultants: run an ISM or Essential Eight assessment on synthetic evidence and read the consultant-grade report before you subscribe.

Request the demo →