CyberSentien💼 Multi-client GRC assessment for consultants and practices
A practice runs many clients on many frameworks at once, and every engagement re-answers the same questions: what is in scope, what evidence exists, how fresh is it, what can we defend? Margins die in the retyping — and reputations die in the overclaim.
Book a demo → Try it on sample docsFrameworks on the engine serving this vertical
Licence-gated catalogues carry control IDs and CyberSentien's own labels only — the full standard text requires your licence and is never reproduced.
Depth today — stated honestly
The global angle
A practice serves clients wherever their obligations sit, and the engine follows the frameworks, not the border. Every framework live on the engine — 43 today, ISM spine included — runs on one book of work. That spans Australia's regulator lanes and the internationally used security instruments (ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 (Trust Services Criteria), SOC 1 (ISAE 3402), PCI DSS v4.0.1, NIST CSF 2.0, CIS Controls v8), plus AI-governance packs across 5 jurisdictions.
See it on the real engine
Run the frameworks above against synthetic sample documents now, or tell us where you sit and we'll send a gated, revocable demo link.
Frequently asked
Can I run multiple clients and frameworks on one platform?
Yes. CyberSentien gives a multi-client practice view with per-engagement scoping across every live framework, from Essential Eight and ISM to APRA CPS 230/234.
How is this different from questionnaire GRC tools?
Reports carry an Evidence Freshness Statement and grade real evidence. Depth is badged honestly per lane — IRAP-grade on ISM/Essential Eight, Tier-A breadth elsewhere — never overstated.
How is CyberSentien different from other compliance platforms?
Most of the category is built around global certification momentum and integration breadth. CyberSentien is built for Australian regulatory depth — Essential Eight maturity, the ISM at IRAP depth, CPS 230/234 and curated sector obligation packs — and it will not render a control compliant without a dated, hash-lineaged artefact. Where the evidence is missing it says so, which is the difference that shows up when an assessor asks.
Does it protect my clients' data sovereignty?
For a licensed engagement, client evidence stays on Australian-sovereign infrastructure under Australian jurisdiction, and the AI runs inside that boundary — never a third-party AI API. Every paying engagement gets its own dedicated Australian box, so one client's evidence is never sitting beside another's. If a client needs the engine inside their own network instead, that is not something we ship today — ask, and we will tell you honestly whether and when that changes.