UN General Assembly Resolution 78/265 assessment on CyberSentien

Tier-A breadth

13 catalogued controls across 13 areas, assessed deterministically against your uploaded and connector-collected evidence — honest coverage against the full catalogue, consultant-grade reporting from one run.

Book a demo on UN General Assembly Resolution 78/265 → Open the sample-evidence demo

Applies to: GRC consultants & practices · AI vendors & providers — GAiaaS

Coverage areas

Bridging the AI and digital dividesContinued international dialogue on AI governanceCooperation and assistance to developing countriesEngagement and support from the UN systemFair, inclusive and responsible data governance for AIHuman rights across the AI lifecycleNational AI governance and multi-stakeholder approachesNational AI strategies and responsible innovationPrivate-sector responsibility (UN Guiding Principles on Business…Safe AI to accelerate the 2030 Agenda (SDGs)Summit of the Future and related mandatesThe UN system's unique role in global AI consensusWSIS+20 review by the General Assembly (2025)

Generated from the live catalogue at build time — control identifiers and CyberSentien's own labels; no standard text is reproduced.

Honest coverage

Verdicts against the FULL catalogue — controls without evidence read “manual assessment required”, never a fabricated pass.

Evidence lineage

Every report carries a run id and SHA-256 integrity anchor; sections trace to the controls and evidence they rest on.

One assessment, every report

The same run renders the UN General Assembly Resolution 78/265 report, executive brief and board pack — no drift between audiences.

See UN General Assembly Resolution 78/265 on the real engine

Run it against synthetic sample documents now, or bring your own evidence in a gated demo week.

Request the demo →