UN General Assembly Resolution 78/265 assessment on CyberSentien

13 catalogued controls across 13 areas, assessed deterministically against your uploaded and connector-collected evidence — honest coverage against the full catalogue, consultant-grade reporting from one run.

Book a UN General Assembly Resolution 78/265 demo → Try it on sample docs

Used by: GRC consultants & practices · AI vendors & providers — GAiaaS

Coverage areas

Bridging the AI and digital dividesSafe AI to accelerate the 2030 Agenda (SDGs)National AI governance and multi-stakeholder approachesCooperation and assistance to developing countriesHuman rights across the AI lifecycleNational AI strategies and responsible innovationFair, inclusive and responsible data governance for AIContinued international dialogue on AI governancePrivate-sector responsibility (UN Guiding Principles on Business…Engagement and support from the UN systemSummit of the Future and related mandatesWSIS+20 review by the General Assembly (2025)The UN system's unique role in global AI consensus

Generated from the live catalogue at build time — control identifiers and CyberSentien's own labels; no standard text is reproduced.

Honest coverage

Verdicts against the FULL catalogue — controls without evidence read “manual assessment required”, never a fabricated pass.

Evidence lineage

Every report carries a run id and SHA-256 integrity anchor; sections trace to the controls and evidence they rest on.

One assessment, every report

The same run renders the UN General Assembly Resolution 78/265 report, executive brief and board pack — no drift between audiences.

See UN General Assembly Resolution 78/265 on the real engine

Run it against synthetic sample documents now, or bring your own evidence in a gated demo week.

Request the demo →